Working Papers

Seria wydawnicza WNE WORKING PAPERS prowadzona jest przez WNE UW od 2008 r. i jak dotąd opublikowano w niej ponad 400 prac.

Seria WNE Working Papers służy szybkiemu upowszechnianiu wyników badań prowadzonych na Wydziale Nauk Ekonomicznych UW. Publikowane tu teksty mają charakter wersji roboczych (pre-printów): mogą być uzupełniane lub poprawiane w miarę postępu prac nad tekstem i procesu wydawniczego. Prezentujemy aktualną wersję udostępnioną przez autorów, opatrzoną datą oraz identyfikatorami DOI/ISSN – co ułatwia jej cytowanie i śledzenie kolejnych iteracji. Każdy dokument zachowuje pełne prawa autorskie swoich twórców, a w przypadku późniejszych zmian, autorzy mogą w dowolnym momencie zamieścić zaktualizowany plik lub wskazać miejsce ostatecznego wydania.

Do serii WORKING PAPERS przyjmowane są artykuły pracowników naukowych WNE UW oraz publikacje z konferencji organizowanych na WNE UW. Artykuły powinny dotyczyć ekonomii, mieć charakter oryginalnych prac badawczych, nie być wcześniej publikowane. Przyjmowane są wyłącznie teksty w języku angielskim.

Prace prosimy przesyłać e-mailem na adres: NQpz'Dk^Wu-d9=A8X72LY/fsxq#]#[FAcfl/SO5fmW-U5%=D'DboKi%br

Prosimy przesyłać dwa pliki:

(1) główny tekst bez podania tytułu artykułu oraz autorów (plik DOC/DOCX) oraz

(2) stronę tytułową zawierającą: tytuł opracowania, autorów oraz ich afiliację (plik DOC/DOCX). 

Przed przesłaniem tekstu prosimy zapoznać się z szczegółowymi wymogami edycyjnymi.

Redaktorem wydawniczym serii Working Papers jest dr Maciej Bukowski.

Ilość wyników 5

WP(19/2018)278. Impact of beliefs about negative effects of wind turbines on preference heterogeneity regarding renewable energy development in Poland

Autorzy: Bartczak Anna, Budziński Wiktor, Gołębiowska Bernadeta
We investigate individuals' preferences for renewable energy development in Poland. Our main objective is to examine whether preferences for avoiding externalities from renewable energy development near respondents' place of residence are inf…

WP278. Impact of beliefs about negative effects of wind turbines on preference heterogeneity regarding renewable energy development in Poland

We investigate individuals' preferences for renewable energy development in Poland. Our main objective is to examine whether preferences for avoiding externalities from renewable energy development near respondents' place of residence are influenced by their personal beliefs about the negative effects of wind turbine activity. We focus on attitudes towards wind power because it has had the most dynamic development among all renewable energy sources in Poland. To elicit values on avoiding renewable energy externalities, we use a choice experiment (CE) approach. To conduct our analysis we applied a theoretically robust econometric approach, the hybrid mixed logit model. From our analysis of data from a large sample of the Polish population, we find that beliefs about wind turbine have distinct negative effects on respondents' preferences concerning renewable energy development. Respondents who generally have an opinion about potential wind turbine effects would like to have input on renewable energy development in their neighbourhood. Latent beliefs that wind power is not harmful enhance respondents' preferences for implementing a wind energy project and enhance preferences against solar power development. These beliefs appears to be significantly correlated with respondents' marginal utility of money.


DOI: http://doi.org.10.26405/WP/WNE/2018/278/019
Bartczak Anna, Budziński Wiktor, Gołębiowska Bernadeta
beliefs about negative effects choice experiment preference heterogeneity renewable energy externalities stated preferences

WP(1/2018)260. Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences

Autorzy: Zawojska Ewa, Bartczak Anna, Czajkowski Mikołaj
Incentivising respondents to truthfully reveal their preferences in stated preference surveys requires that they believe their survey responses can influence decisions related to the outcome in question (policy consequentiality) and that they will ha…

WP260. Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences

Incentivising respondents to truthfully reveal their preferences in stated preference surveys requires that they believe their survey responses can influence decisions related to the outcome in question (policy consequentiality) and that they will have to bear their share of coercive cost if the outcome is implemented (payment consequentiality). We investigate the effects of these two aspects of consequentiality on stated preferences in a field survey concerning renewable energy development in Poland. We find that beliefs in policy and payment consequentiality strengthen respondents' interest in having the project implemented, but policy consequentiality decreases, while payment consequentiality increases their sensitivity to the project cost, thus increasing or decreasing their willingness to pay, respectively. We conclude that the two components of consequentiality should be addressed separately in stated preference studies. Additionally, we inquire the theoretically speculated links between respondents' perceptions about policy and payment consequentiality and their risk attitudes, finding no significant relationship.


DOI: https://doi.org.10.26405/WP/WNE/2018/260/001
Zawojska Ewa, Bartczak Anna, Czajkowski Mikołaj
stated preferences discrete choice experiment policy consequentiality payment consequentiality risk attitudes renewable energy

WP(36/2016)227. Gain and loss of money in a choice experiment. The impact of financial loss aversion and risk preferences on willingness to pay to avoid renewable energy extarnalities.

Autorzy: Bartczak Anna, Chilton Susan, Czajkowski Mikołaj, Meyerhoff Jürgen
We examine how the direction of price changes affects the value people place on avoiding renewable energy externalities in Poland. Additionally, we investigate the influence of individuals' financial loss aversion and financial risk preferences o…

WP227. Gain and loss of money in a choice experiment. The impact of financial loss aversion and risk preferences on willingness to pay to avoid renewable energy extarnalities.

We examine how the direction of price changes affects the value people place on avoiding renewable energy externalities in Poland. Additionally, we investigate the influence of individuals' financial loss aversion and financial risk preferences on this valuation. In our study we conduct a choice experiment survey in which respondents' choices indicate the value they place on avoiding wind, solar, and biomass externalities. We combine this survey with a financial lottery choice task that elicits the respondents' risk preferences and degree of loss aversion. In the choice experiment we use both increases and decreases in electricity bills to depict the uncertain effect of new sources of energy generation on the current price level. This design allows us to investigate if obtained values are independent of the payment mechanism. In the analyzed context, our results indicate that marginal utility of money seems to be lower with a rebate on the energy bill than with a surcharge. Moreover, financial risk preferences affect people's choices in a case of a surcharge, while loss aversion for money affects them in the case of a rebate. We find that the more loss averse people are with regard to money, the more they require compensation before they accept externalities from renewable electricity production. In contrast, the more risk seeking people are in a financial domain, the less cost sensitive they are and the more willing they are to pay for proposed changes in renewable electricity generation.


Bartczak Anna, Chilton Susan, Czajkowski Mikołaj, Meyerhoff Jürgen
choice experiment externalities of renewable energy loss aversion lottery experiment marginal utility of money risk preferences

WP(37/2015)185. Use and non-use values in an applied bioeconomic model of fisheries and habitat connections

Autorzy: Armstrong Claire W., Kahui Viktoria, Vondolia Godwin K., Aanesen Margrethe, Czajkowski Mikołaj
In addition to indirect support to fisheries, marine habitats also provide non-use benefits that are overlooked in most existing bioeconomic models. Our paper expands a dynamic bioeconomic fisheries model in which the presence of natural habitats not…

WP185. Use and non-use values in an applied bioeconomic model of fisheries and habitat connections

In addition to indirect support to fisheries, marine habitats also provide non-use benefits that are overlooked in most existing bioeconomic models. Our paper expands a dynamic bioeconomic fisheries model in which the presence of natural habitats not only reduces the cost of fishing, via aggregation effects, but also supplies non-use benefits. The theoretical model is illustrated with the analysis of cold water corals in Norway where two fishing methods are considered – destructive bottom trawl and non-destructive coastal gear. Non-use values of cold water corals in Norway are estimated using a discrete choice experiment. Both the theoretical model and its empirical applications show how non-use values impact upon the optimal fishing practices.


Armstrong Claire W., Kahui Viktoria, Vondolia Godwin K., Aanesen Margrethe, Czajkowski Mikołaj
renewable non-renewable habitat fishery bioeconomic use and non-use value

WP(19/2015)167. Marine trade-offs: comparing the benefits of off-shore wind farms and marine protected areas

Autorzy: Karlõševa Aljona, Nõmmann Sulev, Nõmmann Tea, Urbel-Piirsalu Evelin, Budziński Wiktor, Czajkowski Mikołaj, Hanley Nick
The drive to increase renewable electricity production in many parts of Europe has led to an increasing concentration of location of new sites at sea. This results in a range of environmental impacts which should be taken into account in a benefit-co…

WP167. Marine trade-offs: comparing the benefits of off-shore wind farms and marine protected areas

The drive to increase renewable electricity production in many parts of Europe has led to an increasing concentration of location of new sites at sea. This results in a range of environmental impacts which should be taken into account in a benefit-cost analysis of such proposal. In this paper, we use choice modelling to investigate the relative gains and losses from siting new windfarms off the coast of Estonia, relative to the option of creating a new marine protected area. Methodologically, the paper makes a contribution by showing the ability of the latent class mixed logit model to represent both within-and between-class preference heterogeneity, and thus its power to provide a more sophisticated representation of preference heterogeneity than latent class or mixed logit approaches. The paper is also the first to use the latent class mixed logit in willingness-to-pay space for environmental goods.


Karlõševa Aljona, Nõmmann Sulev, Nõmmann Tea, Urbel-Piirsalu Evelin, Budziński Wiktor, Czajkowski Mikołaj, Hanley Nick
discrete choice experiment off-shore wind energy marine protected areas willingness to pay renewable energy
  • 1